[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Print-Only Subscription Trend
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Print-Only Subscription Trend
- From: "McCutcheon,Christine [Burlington]" <Christine.McCutcheon@ec.gc.ca>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:46:17 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Kim Steinle wrote: <snip> > Are librarians intentionally selecting print-only? Or, is this > a default that the agent is selecting? We are concerned that > libraries are inadvertently losing electronic access. I would > be curious as to know why so many libraries are choosing > print-only. With apologies for the late reply, but I didn't see any responses with this type of situation (ours): A special (federal government department) library with several locations across the country has moved from local site licensing to enterprise-wide multi-site licenses for selected electronic journals. Print subscriptions are still purchased locally, and one or more of the local sites have chosen to continue their print subscriptions to some of the e-journals being licensed . They would then purchase the 'print only' subscription. (And as was mentioned by somebody earlier, some publishers insist that the organization maintain at least one print subscription when licensing the electronic version enterprise-wide). Hope that helps, Christine McCutcheon Systems and Services Librarian Environment Canada
- Prev by Date: Re: Maximising research access vs. minimizing copy-editing errors
- Next by Date: RE: Publishers and the doctrine of Good Works
- Previous by thread: Re: Print-Only Subscription Trend
- Next by thread: Errors in author's versions
- Index(es):