[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Blackwell Announces High Growth in Impact Factor
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Blackwell Announces High Growth in Impact Factor
- From: "David Davis" <ddavis@copyright.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:40:51 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I think an answer to Mr. Prosser's question might entail an answer to this one: Statistically speaking, for any given article (and by composition, any given journal, or set of journals from any given publisher) is the IF absolute, or relative? I mean, is it determined primarily by the total number of cites ( I would call this absolute), or is its variance more relative to the citedness of the other articles in the year for which it is measured? Or is it a mix of these? (Or quite possibly I am off the mark altogether ;-) ). Other factors come into play as well, but perhaps we could start some clarifying by going down this route. Dave Davis
- Prev by Date: Re: Print-Only Subscription Trend
- Next by Date: Response to Janellyn Kleiner
- Previous by thread: RE: Blackwell Announces High Growth in Impact Factor
- Next by thread: RE: Blackwell Announces High Growth in Impact Factor
- Index(es):