[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Print-Only Subscription Trend
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Print-Only Subscription Trend
- From: Tom Williams <twilliam@bbl.usouthal.edu>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:38:50 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Maybe because print-only is cheaper. We're still plugging ahead with our E-only policy. Tom Kim Steinle wrote:
In 2006 Duke University Press decoupled print and electronic subscriptions and offered three format options: print plus electronic, print-only and electronic-only. We have noticed a heavy uptake of the print-only format (40% + across the board), which seems unusual given the current buzz of libraries going electronic-only. Are librarians intentionally selecting print-only? Or, is this a default that the agent is selecting? We are concerned that libraries are inadvertently losing electronic access. I would be curious as to know why so many libraries are choosing print-only. Kimberly Steinle Library Relations Manager Duke University Press Durham, NC 27701 ksteinle@dukeupress.edu www.dukeupress.edu
- Prev by Date: Open Choice Singular Limits.
- Next by Date: RE: Blackwell Announces High Growth in Impact Factor
- Previous by thread: Print-Only Subscription Trend
- Next by thread: Re: Print-Only Subscription Trend
- Index(es):