[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: practical solution
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: practical solution
- From: Mark Funk <mefunk@med.cornell.edu>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 19:03:36 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
At 12:01 AM -0400 7/1/06, David Goodman wrote:
Rather, the reasonable suggestion is that money from the no-longer-necessary journal subscriptions be used to help pay for OA fees--but not directly by the library.
<snip>
Librarians could right now cancel their most expensive (and not cost-effective) subscriptions for 2007, regardless of tradition; they could then inform the provost that they would like to apply about half this money to help faculty pay author fees, and would she please distribute the money. (explaining that the other half will be used for long-standing library needs that he's been asking her to fund for years, and will no longer have to ask.)Most libraries cancelled their "expensive and not cost-effective" journals years ago. There are no more "no-longer-necessary" journals left to cancel. Cancelling titles nowadays means losing titles our users want and need. To use this money to then pay for "Open Choice" publishing is like robbing five or six Peters to pay one Paul.
Mark Funk
Head, Collection Development
Weill Cornell Medical Library
1300 York Avenue
New York, NY 10021
mefunk@med.cornell.edu
PH: 212-746-6073
FX: 212-746-8271
- Prev by Date: Open Scholarship 2006: New Challenges for Open Access Repositories
- Next by Date: Springer Launches eBook Program
- Previous by thread: Re: practical solution
- Next by thread: Re: practical solution
- Index(es):