[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: practical solution
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu, Janellyn P Kleiner <jkleiner@lsu.edu>
- Subject: Re: practical solution
- From: Karl Bridges <Karl.Bridges@uvm.edu>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 20:52:29 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Jane has the right idea. Libraries are the wrong place to put this responsibility -- for a whole set of reasons. The problem with author fees is simple. Higher education requires publication from faculty as a condition of employment. Making faculty pay these fees as individuals is making them have to pay for the privilege of being employed. I think this is called a kickback. If universities want to require publication they need to budget for these fees and pay them. It's simply a cost of doing business like the heat or the water. Personally, I'm on the opinion this ought to be centrally budgeted rather than coming out of the library line because central administrations are better equipped to deal with financial obligations that are spread all over campus -- as well as being the people administering grants and contracts -- which, arguably, is where alot of these fees should be coming from. Karl Bridges Associate Professor Information and Instruction Services Bailey Howe Library University of Vermont karl.bridges@uvm.edu <mailto:karl.bridges@uvm.edu>
- Prev by Date: Re: Open Choice is a Trojan Horse for Open Access Mandates
- Next by Date: 2006 conference of the Association of American University Presses,
- Previous by thread: Re: practical solution
- Next by thread: Re: practical solution
- Index(es):