[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
article on impact factor in WSJ
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: article on impact factor in WSJ
- From: "Hamaker, Chuck" <cahamake@email.uncc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 18:21:38 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Science Journals Artfully Try To Boost Their Rankings WSJ By SHARON BEGLEY June 5, 2006; Page B1 Excerpts from the article: "Scientists and editors say scientific journals increasingly are manipulating rankings -- called "impact factors" -- that are based on how often papers they publish are cited by other researchers." "One questionable tactic is to ask authors to cite papers the journal already has published,..." "Journals also can resort to "best-of" features, such as running annual summaries of their most notable papers" "Journals can limit citations to papers published by competitors, keeping the rivals' impact factors down" "Scientists and publishers worry that the cult of the impact factor is skewing the direction of research." "Another concern is that impact factors, since they measure only how many times other scientists cite a paper, say nothing about whether journals publish studies that lead to something useful. As a result, there is pressure to publish studies that appeal to an academic audience oriented toward basic research." Chuck Hamaker Associate University Librarian Collections and Technical Services Atkins Library University of North Carolina Charlotte Charlotte, NC 28223
- Prev by Date: WSJ in impact factor
- Next by Date: IOP to provide subscription fulfilment and distribution services f=
- Previous by thread: WSJ in impact factor
- Next by thread: IOP to provide subscription fulfilment and distribution services f=
- Index(es):