[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Posting vendors' PDFs
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu, Liblicense-L Listowner <liblicen@pantheon.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Posting vendors' PDFs
- From: Karl Bridges <Karl.Bridges@uvm.edu>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 12:09:59 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
It depends on your license agreement with the vendor. I strongly suspect that they retain the rights to "their" PDF and would take great exception to having it posted somewhere else. For example, I noticed a while ago that, although the University of Virginia has a number of publicly available PDFs of documents available for anyone to use, they very specifically deny people the rights to mount copies of these elsewhere, claiming that it does not serve their interest to have multiple copies of these documents existing. My take on this would be that the PDF from a particular vendor represents their work product. As such you would not be allowed to simply make copies. By doing that you are actually creating a disincentive to people to purchase the particular product (JSTOR, whatever). I realize that it's just one, but if you had a thousands of people doing this you, essentially, given the nature of Google, have essentially dismantled the product. It's actually a very interesting question: Vendors generally have licenses and technology in place to prevent individual institutions from disaggregating the product e.g. creating local archives of massive amounts of a particular database. I have a number of databases that record and have mechanisms to make downloading lots of material impossible or very difficult. What your mentioning is a kind of "distributed disaggregation". Individually, no one is violating their licenses, but the collective effect is the same. I strongly suspect in future you will see publishers adding license language that prevents participation in these kinds of schemes. Quoting Liblicense-L Listowner <liblicen@pantheon.yale.edu>: > From another list ... of possible interest (and response) to > readers of liblicense-l? Ann Okerson > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 10:49:38 -0400 > From: Richard Griscom <griscom@pobox.upenn.edu> > To: SPARC Institutional Repositories Discussion List <SPARC-IR@arl.org> > Subject: [SPARC-IR] Posting vendors' PDFs > > The following question came up in a recent meeting of the repository > oversight group at Penn: Do vendors retain proprietary rights over > the PDF files they prepare for full-text databases? For example, if > we receive permission from Publisher Y to mount Professor X's paper > in our repository, may we use a PDF created by Project Muse or JSTOR > in lieu of scanning the article ourselves? Do these vendors exercise > rights over the use of the PDFs that they have prepared? > > Best, > Richard Griscom > > -- > Richard Griscom office 215/898-3450 > Head, Otto E. Albrecht Music Library and fax 215/898-0559 > Eugene Ormandy Music and Media Center griscom@pobox.upenn.edu > University of Pennsylvania > Van Pelt Library, 3420 Walnut Street, Philadelphia PA 19104-6206
- Prev by Date: Re: Spider Activity Reports from Blackwell Synergy
- Next by Date: Re: Posting vendors' PDFs
- Previous by thread: Re: Spider Activity Reports from Blackwell Synergy
- Next by thread: Re: Posting vendors' PDFs
- Index(es):