[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Scanning licenses
- To: "Liblicense" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Scanning licenses
- From: "Sally Morris \(ALPSP\)" <sally.morris@alpsp.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:23:42 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I wonder whether readers of this list are aware of the project 'ONIX for licensing terms' which might make mere scanning of licences unnecessary, by instead expressing in machine-readable terms (rather, if you like, in the way that Creative Commons does for its user licences) the terms and conditions of customer licences for e-journals and other publications. See http://www.editeur.org/onix_licensing.html for more details
Sally Morris, Chief Executive
Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers
South House, The Street, Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex BN13 3UU, UK
Email: sally.morris@alpsp.org
----- Original Message -----
From: "Curtis Lavery" <laveryc@sbcglobal.net>
To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 12:31 AM
Subject: Re: Scanning licenses
Hi Julie,
The California Digital Library has been scanning licenses for more than 2 years. Our purpose was twofold: to provide a document for those who need to view and understand its contents; and to digitize a fully executed document for archiving in a secure, remote location. We also maintain a locked archive of original print licenses for internal reference needs and auditors. In addition to a scanned version of the full document, we also redact the license for personal and cost information and scan it for reference by campus users.
We have not normally ocr'ed any of these documents. At present we maintain a relational database that gives us some information upon inquiry about license terms and contacts. Over the course of the next year we hope to have initiated our ERM, which will replace and enhance our home-grown file. Since license provisions are narrative and typically need interpretation, I feel that indexing beyond what we can obtain from acrobat doesn't merit our effort.
Our biggest problem when we began was locating license originals for scanning and filing in a locked archive. Different categories of documents had been stored in different locations. We used a simple excel file to note and track the status of each expected license.
We also scan and archive our other contractual documents, breach allegation documentation, and requests we receive for public records.
If you have any specific questions, please contact me at
curtis.lavery@ucop.edu.
With best wishes,
Curtis Lavery
California Digital Library
_______________________________
Julie Blake <jblake11@jhuadig.admin.jhu.edu> wrote:
(Apologies for duplication).
We're interested in scanning licenses so they're available for
various constituencies and searchable (OCR?) as well. We do not
yet have an ERM, but would like to get started anyway. We know
there have got to be others that are way ahead of us in this
game, so I'm throwing myself upon your tender mercies. Who's
doing this? How? Thoughts, ideas, warnings? Anyone have an open
source solution for organizing or scanning?
Thanks,
Julie C. Blake
Serials & Electronic Resources Acquisitions Coordinator
Sheridan Libraries, Johns Hopkins University
julie.blake@jhu.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: NYT on Cornyn-Lieberman
- Next by Date: RE: Does BMC's business model conflict with Editorial Independence?
- Previous by thread: Re: Scanning licenses
- Next by thread: Re: Scanning licenses
- Index(es):