[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Graphing the Bergstrom and McAfee Journal Pricing Data
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, <cahamake@email.uncc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Graphing the Bergstrom and McAfee Journal Pricing Data
- From: "Joseph J. Esposito" <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 21:38:55 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I don't wish to engage the substance of this debate, but I will clarify one business point.
* There are three, not two, structural categories. A journal publisher can remain independent (category #1).
* A journal publisher can license rights, usually for a limited period of time, to a larger publisher. That larger publisher essentially becomes THE publisher: setting prices, etc.
* The third category is when the journal publisher forms a distribution (not publishing) relationship with a larger publisher. The larger publisher makes its operations available to the smaller publisher--essentially it sells services. But the smaller publisher still controls pricing and many aspects of marketing. Such distribution agreements often have shorter terms than full-fledged publishing agreements. Apparently Lisa Dittrich's organization has a distribution agreement with a larger publisher.
None of this challenges the core of Bergstrom and McAfee's findings, as far as I can tell: Most of the time most commercial operations charge more than most not-for-profit organizations. I don't think this is a startling claim.
Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: Re: Academic Medicine for Dodos
- Next by Date: RE: Revisions to the Bergstrom and McAfee Graphs
- Previous by thread: Re: Graphing the Bergstrom and McAfee Journal Pricing Data
- Next by thread: Re: Graphing the Bergstrom and McAfee Journal Pricing Data
- Index(es):