[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Academic Medicine for Dodos
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Academic Medicine for Dodos
- From: Marjory Waite <waite@email.unc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 21:27:28 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I for one would like to thank Mr. Bergstom for his very gentlemanly reply to being called a dodo. I am an infrequent contributor to this list but a very ardent reader. And frankly I find some of the comments in reply to contributors expressed opinions unsettling. Exchange of opinions should be just that. Surely one can respond to or counter an opinion/belief in a straight forward, non-inflammatory manner. This is not a matter of taking sides on my part, just wanting to read counter opinions without the extraneous comments. Thanks for reading, Marjory Waite
- Prev by Date: DASER 2 IR Meeting and NIH Public Access Policy
- Next by Date: Re: Graphing the Bergstrom and McAfee Journal Pricing Data
- Previous by thread: Academic Medicine for Dodos
- Next by thread: van Der Wurff's Article
- Index(es):