[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Open access: a must for Wellcome Trust researchers [response to comments from ALPSP]
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Open access: a must for Wellcome Trust researchers [response to comments from ALPSP]
- From: "Kiley ,Mr Robert" <r.kiley@wellcome.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 20:14:17 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Sally, The problem with taking a single sentence out of context, as you have done, is that it can lead to misinterpretation: all the Trust's policies and supporting documents should be read in their entirety and not quoted out of context. We would stress again, as we have done in all communications with our researchers, that they should make themselves fully aware of the policy as a whole before taking any action. The Grant Conditions themselves make it abundantly clear that they must be read in conjunction with the Policies and Positions: the Grant Conditions are intended as a high level document; the Policies and Positions underpin the Grant Conditions with more operational detail. We keep all our policies under review and we will update and change our guidance based on the feedback we receive directly. Further, the policy does not **only** apply to grants awarded from 1 October 2005 - it will also affect existing grant holders whose grants are still current on 1 October 2006. Consequently, we were duty bound to alert current grant holders that papers in preparation now may well come under the new policy. Our communication strategy was to alert everyone who might be affected, and back this up with the detail on our web site. In the first week of taking our policy live 55 manuscripts were deposited via the NIHMS system; 11 of these are now available for free in PMC, in a format that can be archived and integrated with other online database resources. Additionally, from our perspective as a funder, these papers are now linked to the original grant awarded, enabling a link between the application process and the outputs - a process which facilitates evaluation and can greatly improve the research process which, as a research organisation, has been our motivating force from the outset. Robert Kiley Head of Systems Strategy & Acting Librarian Wellcome Library. Library Web site: http://library.wellcome.ac.uk -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu]On Behalf Of Sally Morris (ALPSP) Sent: 11 October 2005 01:27 To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Open access: a must for Wellcome Trust researchers [response to comments from ALPSP] I beg to differ The Wellcome's message to EXISTING grant-holders starts by saying: "the Trust requires copies of all authors' research papers, supported in whole or in part by Wellcome Trust funding, to be made freely accessible on the Internet as soon as possible, and in any event no later that six (6) months after the publication." There is NO MENTION of the fact that this policy, in fact, only applies to grants awarded from 1 October 2005 and, since it was sent to existing grant recipients (including many who have papers in press or indeed published, and have thus signed agreements with publishers) I can well understand their consternation I fail to see why Wellcome does not think a clarification is necessary Sally Morris, Chief Executive Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers Email: sally.morris@alpsp.org
- Prev by Date: Solution for Google Print for Libraries?
- Next by Date: Journal of Experimental Medicine to Change Publishing Frequency
- Previous by thread: Re: Open access: a must for Wellcome Trust researchers [response to comments from ALPSP]
- Next by thread: Re: Open access: a must for Wellcome Trust researchers [response to comments from ALPSP]
- Index(es):