[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Shrinkwrap/boxtop license in NYT
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Shrinkwrap/boxtop license in NYT
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 20:48:31 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I actually take a similar approach here at my library -- I have a student employee sign all of our license agreements. Dang, did I just say that in a public forum? --- Rick Anderson Dir. of Resource Acquisition Univ. of Nevada, Reno Library rickand@unr.edu ________________________________ From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu on behalf of Carter Glass Sent: Mon 10/3/2005 2:25 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Shrinkwrap/boxtop license in NYT Back when my daughter was learning her letters, I bought a new PC. I taught her to understand 'yes', 'no' and 'c:\' . I had her install all of my software. This way I was not bound by any of the license agreements... Maybe we can have small children open all of these packages. Rick Anderson wrote: >>Pay attention next time you rip open a cardboard box - you may be >>entering into a contract without realizing it. > > This strikes me as a kind of a misleading lede for a story about a > decision concerning shrinkwrap licenses that are actually written on the > _outside_ of the package. I'm more concerned about license "agreements" > that can only be read once you've broken the shrinkwrap, and that say > you're now (surprise!) bound to their terms by virtue of having broken the > shrinkwrap. > > It will be interesting to see what happens if this decision is taken to a > higher court, given the Ninth Circuit's abysmal record on appeal.
- Prev by Date: Re: Open access to research worth 1.5bn a year
- Next by Date: RE: Open access: a must for Wellcome Trust researchers
- Previous by thread: Re: Shrinkwrap/boxtop license in NYT
- Next by thread: Yahoo and digital books
- Index(es):