[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Shrinkwrap/boxtop license in NYT
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Shrinkwrap/boxtop license in NYT
- From: Carter Glass <cglass@agu.org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 17:25:56 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Back when my daughter was learning her letters, I bought a new PC. I taught her to understand 'yes', 'no' and 'c:\' . I had her install all of my software. This way I was not bound by any of the license agreements... Maybe we can have small children open all of these packages. Rick Anderson wrote:
Pay attention next time you rip open a cardboard box - you may be entering into a contract without realizing it.This strikes me as a kind of a misleading lede for a story about a decision concerning shrinkwrap licenses that are actually written on the _outside_ of the package. I'm more concerned about license "agreements" that can only be read once you've broken the shrinkwrap, and that say you're now (surprise!) bound to their terms by virtue of having broken the shrinkwrap. It will be interesting to see what happens if this decision is taken to a higher court, given the Ninth Circuit's abysmal record on appeal.
- Prev by Date: RE: Open access to research worth 1.5bn a year
- Next by Date: Re: Open access to research worth 1.5bn a year
- Previous by thread: RE: Shrinkwrap/boxtop license in NYT
- Next by thread: RE: Shrinkwrap/boxtop license in NYT
- Index(es):