[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open
- From: "Joseph J. Esposito" <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:33:47 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I don't want to step into the discussion (which is fascinating) about how
to think of Google's indexing activity, but the statement at the end of
Eric Hellman's post gives me pause: " if a person can't read it, it's not
a copy." It seems to me that it is a legitimate business enterprise to
create content that can be read by machines. For example,
text-to-speech-synthesis technology incorporatates dictionaries, which are
put in a form that a human could not read. I would think that the
publisher of that dictionary would have a right to be compensated for such
uses. In my salad days I published dictionaries and licensed any number
of content databases for machine use. This is bound to be a growth area
for publishers.
Joe Esposito
----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Hellman" <eric@openly.com>
To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 5:09 PM
Subject: RE: Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open
Calling google's digitization effort a card catalog is putting the
emphasis on the technical fact that a search engine doesn't ever search
the full text, it actually searches an index that has been built from
the full text. The interesting legal question at issue is whether the
law considers robots reading books to create indexes to be substantively
different from allowing humans to read books to create indexes without
infringing the copyrights of authors. There are arguments both ways. The
argument that they are different is framed in terms of calling the
digital instantiation of the book a "copy", while the argument that they
are the same is framed in terms of the process of creating the index.
Personally, I think authors, libraries and publishers will all benefit
from a legal environment where indexing is uninhibited and copying is
strictly proscribed (where copying is defined in terms of producing
functional equivalents of works- if a person can't read it, it's not a
copy).
Eric
--
Eric Hellman, President Openly Informatics, Inc.
eric@openly.com 2 Broad St., 2nd Floor
tel 1-973-509-7800 fax 1-734-468-6216 Bloomfield, NJ 07003
http://www.openly.com/1cate/ 1 Click Access To Everything
- Prev by Date: Registration, International Bielefeld Conference
- Next by Date: Re: Open access to research worth �1.5bn a year
- Previous by thread: RE: Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open
- Next by thread: Re: Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open
- Index(es):