[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open
- From: Eric Hellman <eric@openly.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 20:09:45 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Calling google's digitization effort a card catalog is putting the emphasis on the technical fact that a search engine doesn't ever search the full text, it actually searches an index that has been built from the full text. The interesting legal question at issue is whether the law considers robots reading books to create indexes to be substantively different from allowing humans to read books to create indexes without infringing the copyrights of authors. There are arguments both ways. The argument that they are different is framed in terms of calling the digital instantiation of the book a "copy", while the argument that they are the same is framed in terms of the process of creating the index. Personally, I think authors, libraries and publishers will all benefit from a legal environment where indexing is uninhibited and copying is strictly proscribed (where copying is defined in terms of producing functional equivalents of works- if a person can't read it, it's not a copy). Eric -- Eric Hellman, President Openly Informatics, Inc. eric@openly.com 2 Broad St., 2nd Floor tel 1-973-509-7800 fax 1-734-468-6216 Bloomfield, NJ 07003 http://www.openly.com/1cate/ 1 Click Access To Everything
- Prev by Date: Re: Open access to research worth �1.5bn a year
- Next by Date: The costs of setting up and maintaining institutional repositories
- Previous by thread: RE: Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open
- Next by thread: Re: Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open
- Index(es):