[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open
- From: "Sally Morris \(ALPSP\)" <sally.morris@alpsp.org>
- Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:01:49 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
What is more to the point, you don't copy the entire book (an act
protected by copyright) in order to create a catalog entry
Sally Morris, Chief Executive
Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers
Email: sally.morris@alpsp.org
----- Original Message ----- From: "Miller, Ron" <rmiller@hwwilson.com>
To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 6:27 PM
Subject: RE: Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open
There seems to be some confusion about the difference between a bibliographic entry in a catalog and a copy of, or excerpt from, a book. Ron Miller
- Prev by Date: EFF & Google "Catalog"
- Next by Date: Re: Open access to research worth �1.5bn a year
- Previous by thread: RE: Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open
- Next by thread: RE: Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open
- Index(es):