[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Berkeley faculty statement on scholarly publishing
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Berkeley faculty statement on scholarly publishing
- From: Jan Velterop <velteropvonleyden@btinternet.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 19:42:42 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I believe Matt must be referring to a quote from Cozzarelli in Chemical & Engineering News (the ACS magazine), May 16, 2005, Volume 83, Number 20, pp. 40-44: http://pubs.acs.org/cen/coverstory/ 83/8320openaccess.html Jan Velterop Velterop von Leyden Open Access Consultancy +44 (0)7932 744 239 openaccess@btinternet.com On 5 Jun 2005, at 23:24, Richard Feinman wrote:
Matthew: Is there an orginal reference for the comment on PNAS that "Evidence for the benefits of Open Access *is* now accruing rapidly. e.g. PNAS just reported that their open access articles, no average, receive 50% more accesses than their subscription-only articles in the first month after publication. This strongly suggests that, even for a widely read journal such as PNAS, there is plenty of demand for access to scientific research articles that is failing to be satisfied by the current subscription model." = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Richard D. Feinman Department of Biochemistry SUNY Downstate Medical Center 450 Clarkson Avenue Brooklyn, NY 11203 (718) 270-2252 FAX: (718) 270-3316
- Prev by Date: RE: Google Print Home Page now offers searching
- Next by Date: Re: Google Print Home Page now offers searching
- Previous by thread: RE: Berkeley faculty statement on scholarly publishing
- Next by thread: RE: Berkeley faculty statement on scholarly publishing
- Index(es):