[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Berkeley faculty statement on scholarly publishing
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Berkeley faculty statement on scholarly publishing
- From: Richard Feinman <RFeinman@downstate.edu>
- Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 18:24:53 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Matthew: Is there an orginal reference for the comment on PNAS that "Evidence for the benefits of Open Access *is* now accruing rapidly. e.g. PNAS just reported that their open access articles, no average, receive 50% more accesses than their subscription-only articles in the first month after publication. This strongly suggests that, even for a widely read journal such as PNAS, there is plenty of demand for access to scientific research articles that is failing to be satisfied by the current subscription model." = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Richard D. Feinman Department of Biochemistry SUNY Downstate Medical Center 450 Clarkson Avenue Brooklyn, NY 11203 (718) 270-2252 FAX: (718) 270-3316
- Prev by Date: Re: NIH as publisher
- Next by Date: RE: Berkeley faculty statement on scholarly publishing/PNAS
- Previous by thread: Re: Google Print (more)
- Next by thread: Re: Berkeley faculty statement on scholarly publishing
- Index(es):