[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
NIH as publisher
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: NIH as publisher
- From: Joseph Esposito <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 00:58:23 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I never thought I would be taking the side of the American Chemical Society on anything, but this story really stunned me: http://www.fcw.com/article88988-05-27-05-Web So now the NIH is becoming a publisher! It is one thing for the NIH to stipulate that research it has funded must include a Web-posted article (a knuckleheaded thing, but it is a funder's prerogative). But it is another thing for the NIH to publish material that has nothing to do with NIH grants. I don't get it. Where does it end? Now we have taxpayer-funded publishers, why not taxpayer-funded ice cream stores and give Ben & Jerry's a run for their money. Chemical Abstracts is arguably the most valuable publishing property in the world, surpassing even Harry Potter. I would imagine the ACS will fight vigorously to protect this asset, as would I, as would just about anyone. What a waste of everybody's time. Oh, NIH, why don't you grow up? -- Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: Database Licenses on Campuses With Affiliated Organizations
- Next by Date: RE: Database Licenses on Campuses With Affiliated Organizations
- Previous by thread: Database Licenses on Campuses With Affiliated Organizations
- Next by thread: RE: NIH as publisher
- Index(es):