[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Utah & Berkeley faculty statement on scholarly publishing
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Utah & Berkeley faculty statement on scholarly publishing
- From: "Margaret Landesman" <margaret.landesman@library.utah.edu>
- Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 20:40:50 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Supposing that you do all these calculations for, say, the state of Utah - rather than for just one school. Would it cost the state of Utah more or less to pay OA fees for all its public higher-ed faculty, or to continue to pay journal subscriptions for several schools? Tossing out private schools, we have two RU1 schools, for whom the cost might prove to be somewhat higher. And we have a number of other schools which have substantial subscription lists and whose faculty, given their teaching loads, must surely be publishing less. All schools would appreciate better journal access. For the state as a whole, maybe OA would work? Margaret Landesman University of Utah
- Prev by Date: What Stewart Brand Said
- Next by Date: Re: Berkeley faculty statement on scholarly publishing
- Previous by thread: What Stewart Brand Said
- Next by thread: Re: Fwd: US University OA Resolutions Omit Most ImportantComponent
- Index(es):