[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NIH policy, information about
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: NIH policy, information about
- From: Heather Morrison <heatherm@eln.bc.ca>
- Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 19:58:41 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
BioMedCentral just might have about the best practices around, I think - not only are they gold, and allow immediate self-archiving - they'll do the archiving on behalf of the author! For more details, see my posting to the SPARC Open Access Forum, Publisher Best Practices: 5 stars for BMC? at https://mx2.arl.org/Lists/SPARC-OAForum/Message/1699.html If I"m wrong and there are better practices around, I've love to hear about them! a personal view by: Heather Morrison On 23-Feb-05, at 5:14 PM, Liblicense-L Listowner wrote:
Have any of you folks out there in library or publisher land done
something to to make researchers aware of the NIH posting (to PMC) policy? Is this something that researchers already know about? Will
learn about from the NIH? From their publishers? From the campus
Grants & Contracts Office? Or? Thank you, Ann Okerson
- Prev by Date: Google's library scanning project
- Previous by thread: RE: NIH policy, information about
- Next by thread: [no subject]
- Index(es):