[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Librarians, Publishing Behavior, & Open Access
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Librarians, Publishing Behavior, & Open Access
- From: "David Goodman" <David.Goodman@liu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 23:31:40 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
There is a superstition among most librarians and most publishers that lower journal prices will mean lower income to the publishers, whether this is brought about by fewer subscription or fewer titles. This will only be the case if the libraries are weak enough to let the money be taken from them, The proper use of money that is freed by some forms of OA, and by cancellations regardless of OA is in purchasing other library material. There is no shortage of opportunities--the scope for expensive digitalization projects will continue for many decades--the possibility of publishing books, whether in the sciences or humanities, will continue indefinitely. When research libraries generally had sufficient funds to purchase the needed journals, the difference between a good and a mediocre collection was in the books purchased, and there were enough good collections that publishers could expect reasonable sales for their scholarly titles. Now there are the possibilities for possible syntheses of media unimagined then-- and their nonrealization is not lack of projects, but lack of funding. Recently the most expensive of the science publishers introduced a new indexing service. In my review http://charlestonco.com/comp.cfm?id=3D43, the conclusion was "buy Scopus if you can" -- but there is no practical way for libraries to afford it. If the publisher discontinued the least important 20% of its journals, most research libraries would have the money, and it would be better spent from every perspective. I am still accustomed to think the most interesting part of a library the new book shelves, and the most interesting part of a publisher's offering, the new titles. During most of my career, I have watched the slow decline in both--and in favor of what-- the lowest quality journals with the least read and cited material. I have heard many fascinating proposals for projects that even the richest libraries can not afford. OA offers libraries and publishers the opportunity to jointly provide academic readers a wider range of material, and academic writers the proper publishing opportunities. Dr. David Goodman Associate Professor Palmer School of Library and Information Science Long Island University dgoodman@liu.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: Librarians, Publishing Behavior, & Open Access
- Next by Date: Launched Today: Ingenta's Premium Service for Libraries
- Previous by thread: RE: Librarians, Publishing Behavior, & Open Access
- Next by thread: RE: Librarians, Publishing Behavior, & Open Access
- Index(es):