[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Librarians, Publishing Behavior, & Open Access
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Librarians, Publishing Behavior, & Open Access
- From: "Mcsean, Tony (ELS)" <T.Mcsean@elsevier.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 23:47:11 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The corporation providing the quotation in Bill's contribution may well be Elsevier, and I feel that it's worth pointing out that earnings per share (EPS) are pretty well independent of pricing policy. We can all point to examples where a company's financial performance has suffered through high price increases and others where the same thing has happened through low price increases. EPS targets hang on strength of product line, costs, new products, acquisitions and de-mergers - just to name a few factors not involving accountancy. Happily, the mention of double-digit price rises can't be Elsevier, since five years ago we pledged ourselves to increases which were both single digit and at the bottom end of the industry range. In 2005 this translated to an overall increase of 5.5%, with continuing profitability sustained (we trust!) by these other means. As you can imagine, I have a particularly personal stake in the idea that some in our profession are trying to work with the for-profit industry. Tony Tony McSe�n Director of Library Relations Elsevier +44 7795 960516 +44 1865 843630 -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of William Walsh Sent: 08 February 2005 02:05 To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Librarians, Publishing Behavior, & Open Access Jill makes some good points. However, if a corporation's stated goal is "to deliver on its long-term targets of above market revenue growth and double digit adjusted EPS growth at constant currencies in 2005 and beyond," what is wrong with some in the profession pointing out that most institutions cannot continue to afford to contribute to this growth through annual double digit or near double digit subscription increases? Whether or not some librarians and library organizations are hypocritical about open access (which should be a separate issue), isn't this what much of this conversation comes down to? This doesn't seem divisive; it seems realistic. And I suspect many in our profession do feel they are trying to work with the for profit publishing community. Bill William Walsh Head, Acquisitions Department Georgia State University Library Atlanta, GA 30303 Email: wwalsh@gsu.edu
- Prev by Date: terms and conditions - in click-through and in hard copylicenses
- Next by Date: RE: Librarians, Publishing Behavior, & Open Access
- Previous by thread: Re: Librarians, Publishing Behavior, & Open Access
- Next by thread: RE: Librarians, Publishing Behavior, & Open Access
- Index(es):