[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Question regarding ILL
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Question regarding ILL
- From: "John Cox" <John.E.Cox@btinternet.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:20:10 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Inter-library loan is really not the issue. Fair use is the issue. If the loan is covered by fair use then no permission or fee is required. If the use to which the loaned item is put does not meet the four tests under the Copyright Act 1976, as amended, then it may constitute a breach of copyright. Those four tests are imprecise, but collectively mean that use for non-commercial educational purposes is allowed. There is nothing to prevent a publisher and a library agreeing on terms and conditions governing inter-library loan that clarify the precise purposes for which such loans may be transacted without further permission. They may restrict or extend the rights under the Act. The copyright law is essentially a default mechanism in this respect. Fair use probably does not cover a loan to a commercial entity like a pharmaceutical company. Instead of relying on vague definitions in the law, the license "a contract between publisher and library" can clarify exactly in what circumstances a loan may be made under fair use conditions -- i.e. without prior permission or fee. The law allows two parties to vary their rights as between them by contract, as long as such agreement is not criminal or otherwise illegal. This is true in the USA as much as it is in the UK. Licenses can make clear and precise what is vague in the legislation. John Cox Managing Director John Cox Associates Ltd Rookwood, Bradden TOWCESTER, Northants NN12 8ED United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 1327 860949 Fax: +44 (0) 1327 861184 E-mail: John.E.Cox@btinternet.com Web: www.johncoxassociates.com -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Rich Dodenhoff Sent: 27 January 2005 22:14 To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: Question regarding ILL Maybe I'm just na�ve, but if ILL is allowed under U.S. Copyright Law, how can publishers refuse to allow libraries in the U.S. to provide ILL? It's guaranteed under the law. Doesn't that make the barring of ILL illegal? Richard Dodenhoff Journals Director American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 9650 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20814-3995 301.634.7997 (p) / 301.634.7061 (f)
- Prev by Date: Article of interest: Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors
- Next by Date: Re: OA needs its own list
- Previous by thread: Re: Question regarding ILL
- Next by thread: Re: BMJ Imbroglio background
- Index(es):