[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question regarding ILL
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Question regarding ILL
- From: "Sally Morris \(ALPSP\)" <chief-exec@alpsp.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:23:53 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I'm not sure it is unambiguously permitted by law for digital, as opposed
to print, content. Better legal minds than mine may be able to
confirm/deny this supposition
Sally Morris, Chief Executive
Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers
E-mail: chief-exec@alpsp.org
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rich Dodenhoff" <rdodenhoff@aspet.org>
To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 10:14 PM
Subject: RE: Question regarding ILL
Maybe I'm just na?ve, but if ILL is allowed under U.S. Copyright Law, how can publishers refuse to allow libraries in the U.S. to provide ILL? It's guaranteed under the law. Doesn't that make the barring of ILL illegal? Richard Dodenhoff
- Prev by Date: RE: SPAM-LOW: RE: Question regarding ILL
- Next by Date: Article of interest: Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors
- Previous by thread: RE: Question regarding ILL
- Next by thread: RE: Question regarding ILL
- Index(es):