[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Critique of STM Critique of NIH Proposal
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Critique of STM Critique of NIH Proposal
- From: Joseph Esposito <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 16:13:21 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
There appears to be a damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't situation here for publishers. If they fail to make publications available for free or at very low cost to developing countries, they are accused of greed or worse. If they do make publications available for free or at low cost, they are crippling the nascent economy. Either way, it's "Bad! Bad! Bad!" I mean, really! The pharmaceutical industry gets beat up the same way. I have a client in Eastern Europe that is prospering in part because they understand that they will be a net importer of intellectual property for years, probably decades, to come, and have built a strategy around that hard truth. One would not expect to build a rival to Wall St. in Omaha, or a new Silicon Valley in New Haven. Some regions simply get somewhere first and the network effects of being the "first mover" carry them along. Rather than encouraging local publishing, it would be better to develop entirely new niches and industries, as the Taiwanese have done with chip manufacture and the mainland Chinese have done with textiles. Innovate, don't replicate. Joe Esposito On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 17:51:10 EST, Carol Priestley <cpriestley@inasp.info> wrote: > I regret that I am even later to the debate, and unsighted on the NIH > proposal. However, INASP experience of donations has been exactly as > Sally describes. > > Publishing in emerging economies is fragile at the best of times. Large > influxes of without cost books not only kill or damage local publishing > but give policy makers the impression that they can cut library budgets to > zero. > > So, the challenges can be four-fold: > > 1) market flooded with non-local publications > > 2) local publishers devastated > > 3) library budgets cut > > 4) information loses a 'value' and an expectation that everything should > be available without cost rises. > > It is therefore vital to strengthen local publishing hand in hand with any > opportunity of providing access. In projects involving text- and/or > reference books enormous strides can be made through co-publishing, > assigning rights etc. It was exactly with many of these issues in mind > that the African Publishers' Network came to being over a decade ago. > > Carol Priestley > Director, International Network for the Availability of Scientific > Publications (INASP) > E-mail: cpriestley@inasp.info
- Prev by Date: OAIster grows by over a million items in less than a month!
- Next by Date: SPARC Partners with Optics Express
- Previous by thread: Critique of STM Critique of NIH Proposal
- Next by thread: Chronicle: Dennis Dillon on the future of libraries
- Index(es):