[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Chronicle: Dennis Dillon on the future of libraries
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Chronicle: Dennis Dillon on the future of libraries
- From: Ann Okerson <ann.okerson@yale.edu>
- Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 18:04:02 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Full text of this opinion piece, arguing that libraries/books will be with us for a long time, is available to subscribers at: www.chronicle.com ___ College Libraries: the Long Goodbye By DENNIS DILLON (UT Austin) I was staring at the budget figures, trying to decide how much we could afford to spend on library books, when a conversation from a couple of weeks before came to mind. I had been on the campus running trail when a familiar face appeared alongside me. It was Bob G., a professor of management. He began chatting about the university's overall financial situation and asked how the library was adjusting to recent cuts. Then he asked me whether I thought that my job would exist 10 years from now. I gave him a blank look, trying to conceal my irritation. "Are you still buying books?" he asked. "Yes, but we're about to run out of space," I conceded. "I thought you told me a couple of years ago that books were inefficient -- that books were expensive to buy and store, and that they didn't get enough use to justify their cost," said Bob. I have had similar conversations hundreds of times over the years. The usual sequence of comments is something like: The university has financial problems, books are expensive, digital information is more efficient, and therefore we don't need libraries or librarians. I asked Bob if that was what he meant. [SNIP] Dennis Dillon is associate director for research services at the libraries of the University of Texas at Austin. copyright 2004 Chronicle of Higher Education
- Prev by Date: Critique of STM Critique of NIH Proposal
- Next by Date: ALPSP-Swets Partnership Awarded Best STM Information Product for 2004
- Previous by thread: Re: Critique of STM Critique of NIH Proposal
- Next by thread: ALPSP-Swets Partnership Awarded Best STM Information Product for 2004
- Index(es):