[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The Green and Gold Roads
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: The Green and Gold Roads
- From: "Dr. James J. O'Donnell" <provost@georgetown.edu>
- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 19:42:12 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
This passage caught my eye: > Yes, it will be a world in which the traditional journal still exists. > Only one change is necessary: The full digital texts of all 2,500,000 > articles published yearly in the world's 24,000 peer-reviewed journals > must be immediately and permanently accessible online toll-free, i.e., > they must be Open Access (OA). I am perhaps arithmetically challenged, but I do not quite see how changing the behavior of 100% of the authors of 2.5M articles in 24K journals counts as *one* change. All of this back-and-forth makes me wonder if a couple of the altercators might not prefer to step outside and settle this at http://www.longbets.org -- That website, connected to the Long Now Foundation, facilitates betting in the public interest on socially important issues with long lead times to resolution. Find somebody who disagrees with you, negotiate and place your bet and put down your money and it is immediately a tax-deductible contribution to the foundation. When the specified time (min. 2 years) elapses and the bet is resolved, Long Bets pays the winning amount to the charity specified by the winning bettor. This would be a way for a couple of folks to get specific about their disagreement and make a prediction that most of us could be around to evaluate in, say, 5 years. Jim O'Donnell Georgetown University
- Prev by Date: Re: The Green and Gold Roads to Open Access
- Next by Date: Help for challenged readers
- Previous by thread: Swets' 'Gateway to China' brings EDP Sciences and IOS Press e-journals to Chinese libraries
- Next by thread: Re: The Green and Gold Roads
- Index(es):