[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Journals, society activities and the zero-sum game (RE: Thoughts on the House of Commons report (Chesler)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Journals, society activities and the zero-sum game (RE: Thoughts on the House of Commons report (Chesler)
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:26:19 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> >Rick Anderson wrote, " ... there's a potentially valid argument to be > >made there. But let's not pretend that mandatory OA won't hurt > >societies." > > Let's also not pretend that the excess profit-taking from scientific > journals has not already hurt libraries and open scientific > communication. Absolutely true, but irrelevant to the issue of OA's potential effect on societies. ---- Rick Anderson rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Brill Academic Publishers 2005 Journal Subscription Prices
- Next by Date: RE: Estimates of Conventional Journals, OA, and Repositories?
- Previous by thread: RE: Journals, society activities and the zero-sum game (RE: Thoughts on the House of Commons report (Chesler)
- Next by thread: Re: Journals, society activities and the zero-sum game (RE: Thoughts on the House of Commons report (Chesler)
- Index(es):