[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Journals, society activities and the zero-sum game (RE: Thoughts on the House of Commons report (Chesler)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Journals, society activities and the zero-sum game (RE: Thoughts on the House of Commons report (Chesler)
- From: "David L. Osterbur" <dosterbu@mcb.harvard.edu>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:08:48 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
>Rick Anderson wrote, " ... there's a potentially valid argument to be >made there. But let's not pretend that mandatory OA won't hurt >societies." Let's also not pretend that the excess profit-taking from scientific journals has not already hurt libraries and open scientific communication. David L. Osterbur, Ph.D. Librarian BioLabs Library Harvard University
- Prev by Date: FW: ALA Testing Copyright Advisory Network
- Next by Date: RE: Journals, society activities and the zero-sum game
- Previous by thread: Journals, society activities and the zero-sum game (RE: Thoughts on the House of Commons report (Chesler)
- Next by thread: RE: Journals, society activities and the zero-sum game (RE: Thoughts on the House of Commons report (Chesler)
- Index(es):