[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pogo: We have seen the enemy, and he is us...
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Pogo: We have seen the enemy, and he is us...
- From: brs4@lehigh.edu
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:08:17 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Is it so clear that some couple thousand colleges and universities in the U.S. are all going to mandate self-archiving *and* that most faculty will actually self-archive even if "required" to do so, despite the best of initial intentions as revealed in one or another survey? How are faculty going to be policed who do not self-archive, or don't want to? Faculties pride themselves on a degree autonomy from administrations. Is it so clear too that the same measure of interest in self-archiving will be displayed across disciplines? Or is it so clear that all the authors at institutions are going to self- archive voluntarily and consistently, if their universities do not enforce or require it? Or that the U.S. government could, should or would make it mandatory for universities or colleges to self-archive research that is not government funded? I do not dispute the desirability of self-archiving, but the solution will emerge when universities gradually divert their serials funds to very efficiently run journal operations that link to institutional repositories, not in imagining what modal logicians call "possible worlds" in which everyone acts reasonably. That is a reason for developing repositories, not a faith in publisher largesse with respect to conferring a "right" to self-archive postprints, nor an assumption that the day will dawn when some very large number of authors and institutions self-archive. I have no illusions about the difficulties involved. But a gradualist approach in which universities develop or take over some lead journals and make this work may be worth a try. These considerations in my mind reflect not prophesies of doom but an assessment of the practical realities involved. It is, incidentally, those realities that working librarians have to work with. We are left picking up the pieces when models don't prove sustainable, as recent history starkly confirms. If we're going to create institutional repositories, it has to be for the right reason. Brian Simboli
- Prev by Date: Re: Mandating OA around the corner?
- Next by Date: BMJ Publishing Group subscription rates for 2005
- Previous by thread: Pogo: We have seen the enemy, and he is us...
- Next by thread: Re: Pogo: We have seen the enemy, and he is us...
- Index(es):