[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Pogo: We have seen the enemy, and he is us...
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Pogo: We have seen the enemy, and he is us...
- From: Stevan Harnad <harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:30:24 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 brs4@lehigh.edu wrote: > As someone who takes the maxim, if it looks too good to be true, it > probably is, I confess to being skeptical about publisher guarantees > of an author "right" to self-archiving. > > Let's see what publishers do when someone does the obvious thing: provide > an open access software engine that takes an article title and takes one > directly to the corresponding self-archived article w/o a lot of > background noise. Too late: The engine(s) already exist. For starters, see: http://oaister.umdl.umich.edu/o/oaister/ and http://citebase.eprints.org/ And, for example, a quarter of a million articles have been self-archived by physicists since 1991, since well before any physics publishers were green: Far from trying to get those articles taken off-line, most physics publishers have since given self-archiving their formal green light. http://romeo.eprints.org/publishers.html (APS was, as far as I know, the very first publisher to go green): "Evolving APS Copyright Policy (American Physical Society)" (1999) http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/0471.html So may I suggest to the research community and its funders that, rather than listening to the armchair prophets of gloom (who have been speculating for over a decade now), they should look instead at the empirical facts and then go ahead and self-archive? The light is green, and it doesn't get any greener... http://www.eprints.org/self-faq/#31-worries In other words (to paraphrase Pogo), we have seen the enemy, and he is *us* (not our publishers!)! Swan & Brown's (2004) JISC/OSI survey reported asked authors "how they would feel if their employer or funding body required them to deposit copies of their published articles in... [OA archives]. The vast majority... said they would do so willingly..." Swan, A. & Brown, S.N. (2004) JISC/OSI Journal Authors Survey Report. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/JISCOAreport1.pdf http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/3628.html Swan, A. & Brown, S.N. (2004) Authors and open access publishing. Learned Publishing 2004:17(3) 219-224. http://www.ingentaselect.com/rpsv/cw/alpsp/09531513/v17n3/s7/ So 100% OA simply awaits the implementation of the UK Select Committee's and the US House Appropriations Committee's recommendation to mandate taking the green road to OA. http://www.eprints.org/signup/sign.php Stevan Harnad
- Prev by Date: Re: UK Inquiry: Conclusions and Recommendations released today/BMC
- Next by Date: Re: The UK report, press coverage, and the Green and Gold Roads toOpen Access
- Previous by thread: self-archiving
- Next by thread: Re: Pogo: We have seen the enemy, and he is us...
- Index(es):