[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Olbers' Paradox and OA
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu, liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Olbers' Paradox and OA
- From: Victoria Reich <vreich@stanford.edu>
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:59:20 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Ann is correct. LOCKSS allows libraries to cache e-journals based on local collection priorities. The Stanford LOCKSS team released the first production version of the software earlier this month. We are grateful to the libraries and publishers who have helped us get this far. Much work remains. Building a digital preservation system is a continual process, which will by definition continue over the very long term. We welcome others to pitch in: to define what needs to be done; and to help do it. Vicky Reich Director LOCKSS Program Stanford University Libraries http://lockss.stanford.edu At 11:22 AM 4/21/2004 -0400, Ann Okerson wrote: [SNIP]
That the costs of storage continue to decline is only a part of the ongoing cost equation. And, for those who mentioned it, LOCKSS, as presently conceived, is important, because it allows libraries to cache ejournals and volumes of particular interest to them, but, at least as conceived now, it's quite a ways from a long-term preservation system or a digital library system. (And I'm writing this as a great admirer of LOCKSS, in which Yale library is an early and enthusiastic member and participant).
*****
- Prev by Date: Reminder: ARL Advanced Licensing Workshop
- Next by Date: Re: How to fund open access journals from available sources
- Previous by thread: Re: Olbers' Paradox and OA
- Next by thread: RE: Olbers' Paradox and OA
- Index(es):