[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: How to fund open access journals from available sources
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: How to fund open access journals from available sources
- From: "D Anderson" <dh-anderson@corhealth.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 00:54:05 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
David Goodman's comments that "neither Phil nor I have any basis except speculation and analogy for the effect on libraries. He is using the possiblity of failure as a reason not to experiment," implies a belief that game theory and other theories of human behavior do not apply to David's scheme. Such theories are not speculation. They have proven their validity over time. It is speculation to assume that this scheme would be the one exception to the rules. There's nothing wrong with experimentation But valid experimentation is based on knowledge. The burden is to provide an empirical basis for expecting that this scheme would succeed, despite research conducted over many years showing otherwise. The key to achieving a practical solution to the problem of access is to base the solution on a body of knowledge pertaining to the issues involved. Dean H. Anderson Publisher COR Health Insight ... not just news http://www.corhealth.com
- Prev by Date: Olbers' Paradox and OA
- Next by Date: EPS report on STM books
- Previous by thread: Re: How to fund open access journals from available sources
- Next by thread: Re: How to fund open access journals from available sources
- Index(es):