[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Elsevier ScienceDirect contracts
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu '" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Elsevier ScienceDirect contracts
- From: "Menefee, Daviess (ELS)" <D.Menefee@elsevier.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:47:42 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Recently a reader of this list posted a question regarding the reason for the difference in the pricing of ScienceDirect contracts. The following explains the variations among the ScienceDirect agreements. There are four types of contracts available to ScienceDirect customers. Each varies according to the amount of content available, the types of functionality available, and the archival rights. Each customer decides which contract best meets the needs of their institution taking into consideration a number of factors and including price. Let's take a moment and look at each of these and see what they offer. 1. ScienceDirect Web Editions. This is electronic access to any subscribed journals and has a backfile of twelve rolling months. It offers browse capability but not searching, linking and personalization. In short, the flexibility of choosing titles and the electronic access fees are included in the full price of the print holdings. 2. ScienceDirect Standard Limited Contract. This offering has more features than Web Editions and provides the full functionality of ScienceDirect, including all abstracts, full text searching, linking, personalization, and the ability to add Backfiles and Reference Works as well as a Pay Per View option. It provides four years of rolling backfile that continues to build throughout the license. Archiving rights are also included. The library makes the choice on a title-by-title basis as to which journals it wants to receive in electronic form. This choice can change from year to year and is not tied to any historical print holdings. The price is a standard rate set at 25% fee based on the selected print subscriptions. 3. ScienceDirect Standard Complete Contract. This is the ScienceDirect offering most customers chose since it provides all the same benefits as the Standard Limited plan but includes the additional option for enhancing access to content through Subject Collections, Consortia Collections and the Freedom Collection. Price is based on historical print subscriptions as well as a commitment from the customer to maintain their collection. Based on the customer's commitment, the electronic fee is discounted by 50% to 12.5%. The Complete Contract also provides archiving rights. 4. ScienceDirect Freedom Plan. In short, this plan is available to customers who have purchased the Complete offering and it allows them to purchase access to all of the available ScienceDirect content to which they do not subscribe at a very reduced rate. The consortia and subject collection models follow the same principle. A comparison of the models may be viewed at: <http://www.info.sciencedirect.com/licensing_options/index.shtml> So why this type of pricing? 1. To provide the most access to scholarly material at traditional levels, namely what content institutions have determined met their needs. Historical print subscriptions have been the basis. 2. To increase this access, where possible, with a variety of additional content models. 3. To add value to the content by enhancing it with full text searching, integrated linking throughout the content, and sophisticated filters (Alerts, Personal Journal lists, Saved Searches). 4. To continue investing in digitizing collections and creating productive features and functionality for scientists and researchers. In sum, these models currently provide a means of acquiring access to as much content and as many features as possible given the limitations of the library's budget. Daviess Menefee Library Relations Elsevier
- Prev by Date: Re: Clarification on misquotation of figure from OSI Guide
- Next by Date: RE: Publishing costs
- Previous by thread: What is scholarship-friendly publishing?
- Next by thread: Pay Per View type licensing agreements
- Index(es):