[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Open access pricing
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu, Heather Morrison <heatherm@eln.bc.ca>
- Subject: Re: Open access pricing
- From: brs4@lehigh.edu
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:31:45 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Yes, I didn't express the idea at all properly. The point would be something more like: would the dominance of one or a few publishers setting high author prices incentivize other commercial publishers to raise their prices as well. Leave out the 'just to survive' in the original posting. Brian Simboli *** Quoting Heather Morrison <heatherm@eln.bc.ca>: > Isn't this the opposite of how competition works? If there is competition > in the author-pays version of open access, would it not be the company > with the lowest price for the service that would have the advantage? > > > On 20-Feb-04, at 1:55 PM, brs4@lehigh.edu wrote: > > > (cross-posted) > > > > Regarding the statement below, the following thought of course occurs > > to many, so it might as well be made explicit for discussion. If > > Elsevier moves into the open access arena, will this pressure commercial > > enterprises such as the BioMed Centrals of the world to raise *their* > > prices, just to survive? > > > > Brian Simboli ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
- Prev by Date: RE: Open access pricing
- Next by Date: subject
- Previous by thread: RE: Open access pricing
- Next by thread: ALA Action Alert: Database Protection Legislation Needs Immediate
- Index(es):