[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
re: Open Access and the ALA
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: re: Open Access and the ALA
- From: "Heather Morrison" <hmorrison@ola.bc.ca>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:08:46 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
This is an excellent point. In addition to showing leadership in the area of open access, to me there are more compelling reasons for library associations to move towards open access publishing. If the purpose of library association publishing is to share information about issues and research that are critical to libraries and the profession, it makes a great deal of sense for library associations to move towards open access. For example, staff working in smaller or less affluent libraries (of which there a great many in the world), are less likely to benefit from institutional memberships, support for personal memberships, or sufficient salaries to be easily able to afford personal memberships. If the goal of publishing is library practice informed by research and theory, then open access is the way to go. On the other hand, if the purpose of publishing is simply to provide a perk for members only, that's a different kettle of fish. My suggestion would be that the relative ease of publishing today should make it possible for societies and associations to do a bit of both. Publish a socially-oriented, who's-doing-what type of magazine for the members, but make sure any important research or theory is available to anyone. Another reason to move towards open access is to benefit the authors by making it easier for more people to access their work. For example, when a Canadian librarian publishes an article in the CLA's Feliciter, it is distributed to members or through subscriptions. Articles in Feliciter are generally of very high quality, and could potentially benefit library people around the world. However, due to the members-and-subscriptions distribution model, it is very unlikely that people outside of Canada and large research libraries in the rest of the world will read the articles. As a member, I would much prefer open access. To me, sharing the best work of Canadian libraries and librarians and the important policy work of the association is far more important than receiving the journal as a perk of membership. I'm not sure if anyone has asked CLA to consider the question of open access - yet. There is nothing new in these arguments, of course - they are exactly the same and the reasons for open access in other disciplines. my two bits, Heather Morrison On 29-Jan-04, at 4:14 PM liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu wrote: The more I think about the open access issue, the more I think it offers an excellent opportunity for libraries to demonstrate both their leadership in the new information age and their commitment to the broadest possible distribution of information. Has anyone suggested to the American Library Association (and its various sections and committees) that it lead by example on the open access front? As a nonprofit organization with the explicit mission of bringing information to the people, it seems like the ALA really ought to be leading the way. Does anyone know whether it is moving in this direction at all? ------------- Rick Anderson rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: OECD Committee for Scientific & Technological Policy: Declarationon Access to Research Data from Public Funding
- Next by Date: SOLINET position available
- Previous by thread: RE: Open access and the ALA
- Next by thread: RE: Hoping for an open Cell
- Index(es):