[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Request for 2004 list prices for EMBO Journal in USD
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Request for 2004 list prices for EMBO Journal in USD
- From: Phil Davis <pmd8@cornell.edu>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 18:14:20 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Bernd-Christoph Kaemper, through his analysis of EMBO pricing has
highlighted two very important changes in the traditional subscription
model:
1) Differential Pricing
2) The rise of opaque pricing models
Differential pricing is not a unique feature of Nature Publishing, nor
commercial publishers in general. Over the last few years, many
publishers (most notably societies) have adopted pricing models whereby
some institutions pay more than others (based on FTE, Carnegie Class,
number of life scientists, country, or combinations of these variables). What is different with Nature, and several other commercial publishers, is
that they are beginning to hide their pricing model. While PNAS, New
England Journal of Nature, Ecological Society of America (to just name a
few) are clear and explicit about how they determine what you will pay,
other publishers are not. Instead of a pricing schedule, you are
encouraged to "contact your representative for a custom quote". How do I
know that we've received a fair quote? I don't. Without seeing the
pricing model, I don't know if they are charging my institution more money
merely because they believe that Cornell should pay more. An ideal market
economy relies on open access to pricing information. Obscuring prices
and moving to a custom-quote model is only detrimental to library
customers in general -- based on market economics, we will all pay higher
prices.
Through his hard work and persistence, Bernd-Christoph Kaemper is
attempting to construct Nature's pricing model by encouraging customers to
share information. This work needs to be encouraged and enhanced by a
method for sharing, comparing, and distributing price quotes within the
library community for those publishers that insist on relying upon hidden
and cagey pricing models. This may be an arena where SPARC may show some
leadership.
Philip Davis
Cornell University Library
****
At 03:55 PM 1/27/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Now this is getting complicated (as usual, *sigh*). Apparently, NPG used a 3 Tier model Small (1-2,999): $2,250 Medium (3,000-11,999): $3,000 Large (12,000-20,000): $3,600 (closely following corresponding FTE ranges for the Nature Research and Review Journals) until late September 2003 and then switched over to the new 5 Tier model mentioned below that will also hold for the Nature Research and Review Journals from 2004 on (if your institution renewed its site licenses for the Nature Journals under the old model, be prepared for big price increases next year. More on that later.) So please send me info on your EMBO quotes if they do NOT fit into the no longer valid 3 tier model given above. (Another scheme seems to have been used for research institutes, where the relevant FTE bands seem to have been scaled down to 1-100, 101-500, 501-1000 R&D FTE.) My current guess is (Print incl. Online, resp. E-only), FTE ranges for Academic Institutions (Research Institutes): 1- 499 ( 1- 100) $2250 $2025 500- 1999 (101- 500) $3000 $2775 2000- 5000 (501-1000) $3600 $3375 5001-10000 $4165 $3940 10000+ $5500 $5275 Bernd-Christoph Kaemper, Stuttgart University Library
- Prev by Date: Learned societies and open access
- Next by Date: Re: Varmus in the Chronicle
- Previous by thread: Re: Request for 2004 list prices for EMBO Journal in USD
- Next by thread: FW: Price Increase of the EMBO Journal for 2004 (A reply to the open letter from SPARC Europe)
- Index(es):