[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Lancet on open access
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Lancet on open access
- From: Stephen Drage <stephen@newleftreview.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:05:22 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
All our back files for the online version of New Left Review come from our own archive, and we've been publishing the journal bi-monthly, more or less, since 1960 to date. Perhaps this isn't the example to refute your suggestion as we're only a small independent publisher with the one journal. Anyway, I'd thought I'd let you know that such publishers do exist. Stephen Drage New Left Review 6 Meard Street London W1F OEG UK Tel: +44 (0) 207 434 1210 Fax: +44 (0) 207 439 3869 http://www.newleftreview.net/ -----Original Message----- From: Hamaker, Chuck [mailto:cahamake@email.uncc.edu] Sent: 19 November 2003 23:00 To: 'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu' Subject: Lancet on open access [SNIP] Because as I said before publishers do not have a long term history of preserving their own publications--they have to go to libraries to get copies of what they published. In spite of Elsevier's recent response I haven't had a publisher yet indicate all copies they digitized for back files came exclusively from the publisher's in-house archives. Pergamon MIGHT have been the exception. Chuck ---
- Prev by Date: Re: Lancet on open access
- Next by Date: Re: Taylor &Francis Buys Marcel Dekker
- Previous by thread: Re: Lancet on open access
- Next by thread: Electronic Information Survey 2004
- Index(es):