Re: STM Statement on Open Access Bill

["Marc Brodsky" <brodsky@aip.org>]

Steve,

There is a logical and practical trap when people use the attractive
phrase of Open Access. There is an assumption, unproven, that Open Access
means more people will actually see and use the material just because more
people have free access to it. History, particularly for publications, has
shown time and again that there are more reasons to do something besides
the fact that it is free. 

I would claim that there are some materials that are more widely read even
when people pay for it than other materials that are free. There are roles
for paid publications, being it the author or reader or library who is
paying. There are roles for free publications. My society and others in
the physics community have many of each.  And sometimes even more people
read or like or use the stuff they pay for. Open Access is a nice model to
experiment with, but do not conclude it will have more usage; certainly it
is premature to legislate it or require it of authors. Therefore the STM
statement is right in promoting wider access, by whatever means, as a nice
goal. Marc

Marc H. Brodsky
Executive Director and CEO         E-mail: brodsky@aip.org
American Institute of Physics       Phone: (301) 209-3131
One Physics Ellipse                       Fax: (301) 209-3133
College Park, MD 20740-3843

>>> sh94r@ecs.soton.ac.uk 11/12/03 07:26PM >>>

From:	sh94r@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Sent:	Wednesday, November 12, 2003 7:26 PM
To:	<liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, Lex Lefebvre <Lefebvre@stm.nl>
Subject:	Re: STM Statement on Open Access 

A glib response to the STM publishers' statement below as far as open
access is concerned would be: so no news there then. But it raises more
important issues.

First, it is right to recognise the remarkable progress that journal
publishers have made in becoming digital in the last decade or so, as is
outlined. The statement welcomes the new open access publishers, as it
should (although it conspicuously avoids the term open access, referring
instead to 'wide and continuous dissemination'). But that is just the
starting point for where we are now.

The statement is a response to the open access movement as a whole, even
though it never mentions open access author self-archiving directly. Now
this element of the open access model is not predicated against journals
or even against subscription journals, as has often been stated in this
forum.  It recognises the important role of high quality peer reviewed
journals, which the archives supplement. What is needed in response from
publishers in statements like the one below is how they can support open
access archiving even if they do not offer open access themselves. Simple
measures such as writing into all agreements with authors the right to
self-archive their published papers would be a start.

Instead, the shortcoming of the statement is encapsulated in its use of
the term 'widely accessible' rather than openly accessible. In other
words, subscription publishers want to compete with open access archives
in terms of access, when they could deploy resources more efficiently by
focussing on other services that would benefit authors and readers.

Open access publishers such as those we have now focus resources on e.g.  
peer review, high production values and the production of preservable
formats, qualities that are accessible to all. Subscription journals have
the same values, but by competing in terms of access without offering open
access must by definition be wasting resources on effectively preventing
access to the majority. It is no longer necessary for this to happen.

This statement is an opportunity missed for publishers to recognise the
critical role of open access and of open access self-archiving and begin
to adjust their business models gradually even if they choose not to be
open access publishers.

Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ,  UK
Email: sh94r@ecs.soton.ac.uk 
Tel:  +44 (0)23 8059 3256     Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 2865