[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Lancet November 8th issue on Open Access
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Lancet November 8th issue on Open Access
- From: Elaine.Alligood@med.va.gov
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 18:13:54 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
If you search +"Jan van Eyck" +"Saint Jerome" via the IMAGES tab in google and spell it correctly you can bring up a couple of images of St. Jerome and his books. If you search the main google you will retrieve a link to this painting's home, The Detroit Institute of Art, where you can easily copy the image as a jpeg with no copyright caveat popups that I noticed. I suspect the Lancet had other reasons or was not able to find the owner of this image. I rarely get to use my Art History degree, but every now and then... http://www.dia.org/collections/euroart/virgin/25.4.html It's a great little painting, 5" X 7" check it out! Elaine C. Alligood, MLS Information Center Manager VA Technology Assessment Program, PCS 11T 150 South Huntington Ave Room D4-145 Boston, MA 02130 617-232-9500 X5778 Cell: 617-957-3756 FAX: 617-264-6587 elaine.alligood@med.va.gov http://www.va.gov/vatap/ -----Original Message----- From: Jill Emery [mailto:Jill.Emery@mail.uh.edu] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 6:24 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Lancet November 8th issue on Open Access I want to disagree with Liz about this matter but can only make a tenuous argument at best. Since we do not know the actual intentions of the copyright holder from withholding the electronic access rights of this image, the best we can do is postulate as to why the image was withheld. Given this caveat, I pose that the image was probably withheld due to the general lack of security in the electronic environment when it comes to images, as opposed to the fact that it was being used in a for-profit journal. It doesn't matter whether the image was to be used in an open access journal or a for profit journal, the risks to the copyright holder would more than likely be equivalent. Just for fun and to see what would come up, I did a Google(TM) search under the Images tab for "Saint Jerome, patron saint of librarians" which resulted in no images being found. However, I was able to find a half dozen images when searching Jan van Eyck and Jerome. Two of the images were from .edu domains, 2 from .org domains and 2 from .com domains. In the end it's difficult to ascertain whether the open access status would have made a difference to the copyright holder or whether the half dozen images currently on the web are there legally or not. Cordially, Jill Emery <Jill.Emery@mail.uh.edu>
- Prev by Date: RE: The Harvards, the Have-Nots, and Open Access
- Next by Date: Re: STM Statement on Open Access Bill
- Previous by thread: Lancet November 8th issue on Open Access
- Next by thread: RE: Lancet November 8th issue on Open Access
- Index(es):