[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Not copyrighting facts (RE: copyrighting FACTS???)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Not copyrighting facts (RE: copyrighting FACTS???)
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:19:15 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> But when you peel away the language of the operative sections, > it essentially does just what you say it does not do: create > copyright-type restrictions on the use of elements of databases that are > not currently covered by copyright. It depends on what you mean by "elements of databases." If by "elements" you mean "facts," then I think you're mistaken. Whatever its weaknesses as a piece of legislation, nothing in HR 3261 would grant the owners of databases exclusive rights of publication, distribution, public display, etc. over any of the facts contained in their databases. ------------- Rick Anderson Director of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries (775) 784-6500 x273 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: a preservation experience
- Next by Date: PLOS in Science Magazine
- Previous by thread: Re: Not copyrighting facts (RE: copyrighting FACTS???)
- Next by thread: RE: Not copyrighting facts (RE: copyrighting FACTS???)
- Index(es):