[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Not copyrighting facts (RE: copyrighting FACTS???)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Not copyrighting facts (RE: copyrighting FACTS???)
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:20:12 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> objections from Democrats that the bill > would allow owners of databases to secure copyright-like protections on > facts within databases, not just.." People arguing for or in behalf of controversial bills often indulge in overheated rhetoric, so it's important to take the characterizations of a bill's opponents (or its proponents, for that matter) with a grain or two of salt. Just because those who oppose the bill say that it would give "copyright-like protections" to facts does not mean that the bill itself would, in fact, allow database providers to copyright facts. ------------- Rick Anderson Director of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries (775) 784-6500 x273 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Berlin Declaration on Open Access
- Next by Date: Re: a preservation experience
- Previous by thread: Berlin Declaration on Open Access
- Next by thread: Re: Not copyrighting facts (RE: copyrighting FACTS???)
- Index(es):