[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
another example of resisting vendors
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: another example of resisting vendors
- From: Samuel Trosow <strosow@uwo.ca>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 17:50:08 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
On a related note to the posting about the Elsivier boycott, here's an interesting entry from EduCause. Do we see the germs of a new trend emerging in terms of what is indeed plausible? Sam Trosow University of Western Ontario MASSACHUSETTS GOES OPEN SOURCE Eric Kriss, administration and finance secretary for the State of Massachusetts, has directed the state's chief technology officer to choose open-source and open-standards technologies whenever possible. Applications for which a cost-effective, open-source alternative is not available can still be bought from vendors such as Microsoft that do not allow access to their source code. Although Massachusetts's IT budget is relatively small compared to other software buyers, some analysts noted that the state's official policy against proprietary software could spell trouble for companies like Microsoft down the road. Laura DiDio of Yankee Group said, "[T]oday's trickle could be a flood in 2005 or 2006." Critics of the policy, including Mike Wendy of the Computing Technology Industry Association (COMPTIA), said it would limit the state's choices and is ultimately bad for taxpayers. (Microsoft is a leading member of the COMPTIA trade group.) NewsFactor Network, 20 October 2003 http://www.newsfactor.com/perl/story/22516.html
- Prev by Date: a preservation experience
- Next by Date: copyrighting FACTS???
- Previous by thread: a preservation experience
- Next by thread: copyrighting FACTS???
- Index(es):