[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
a preservation experience
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: a preservation experience
- From: Office of The Provost <provost@georgetown.edu>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 17:37:43 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
It might not be irrelevant to this list's consideration of issues surrounding digital resources and their preservation to hear a little story of discovery. A colleague had 'published' an article in the proceedings of an international conference about three years ago. The proceedings were only published on-line, and she had linked from her own home page to the official version. On looking for that article a couple of days ago (to verify some quotations and figures), she discovered that the original publisher had either moved or deleted the original file. A moderately thorough search of the site showed that it was advertising *next* year's conference in the same series, but the publication itself was gone. A Google search was no help. Consulted on this, I wondered what would happen if . . . So I went to the Internet Archive site (www.archive.org) and used their "Wayback Machine": type in the URL of the desired resource and see what happens. In a few seconds (good DSL), I had the list. Hits are listed by Wayback by date of archiving sweep -- thus, if the same file was modified over time, captures at different dates will capture different versions. There were 6 hits for the year 2001 and 1 for February 2002, none since (suggesting when the original was lost). The first hit proved a null set -- file not found. The second through seventh were all gold: the original file in its original 'published' form, complete with all graphics and links. I was gobsmacked! It left me feeling as I do when I try some improbable keystroke combination deep in the bowels of Microsoft Word, and something I thought impossible suddenly happens. I feel equally sure that the achievement might be hard to reproduce. (Naturally we made a copy to hold onto.) Does this model suggest the value of a comprehensive Internet archive? Does it exemplify the "Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe" principle? Or was it gross dumb luck? I leave these questions to others to discuss. Jim O'Donnell Georgetown University
- Prev by Date: Re: Call for Boycott of Cell Press Journals
- Next by Date: another example of resisting vendors
- Previous by thread: Re: Call for Boycott of Cell Press Journals
- Next by thread: Re: a preservation experience
- Index(es):