[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: License problem with American Geophysical Union
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: License problem with American Geophysical Union
- From: "rrhoon.mail.ncsu.edu" <robert_hoon@ncsu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 22:07:27 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Obviously common law can vary from state to state (that is also why I indicated many AG's would opine . . . not all) -- but many states hold that the execution of a contract with a clause contrary to state law is an ultra vires act e.g. state of Washington. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kent Mulliner" <mulliner@ohio.edu> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 6:38 PM Subject: RE: License problem with American Geophysical Union > I think a contracting party (e.g., AGU) can expect that a person > designated to sign contracts for an institution is acting on behalf of the > institution. Of course, such a designated signer cannot obligate the > institution to violate the laws of the state. > > But to get to Rick's question, we solved the AGU license problem by > inserting, "to the extent permitted by the laws of the State of Ohio," > into several clauses in the contract, which in my non-lawyerly opinion > (supported by university legal counsel) makes the clauses meaningless > since they do violate what is permitted by Ohio law. It was my impression > that the AGU recognized this as well. That was how I spent my summer, but > we received the fully signed contract a few days ago. > > K. Mulliner Collection Development Coordinator > mulliner@ohio.edu
- Prev by Date: FW: OUP online missing content
- Next by Date: RE: Usage-based pricing, a view
- Previous by thread: Re: License problem with American Geophysical Union
- Next by thread: Re: License problem with American Geophysical Union
- Index(es):