[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: License problem with American Geophysical Union
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: License problem with American Geophysical Union
- From: "rrhoon.mail.ncsu.edu" <robert_hoon@ncsu.edu>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:39:28 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
*I also neglected to mention that some state institutions view assumption of liability for acts of third parties as a contractual attempt at abrogation or waiver of sovereign immunity, and for others it may also be a violation of their existing tort claims act (the proscribed statutory mechanism by which all claims against the state or its subdivisions/agencies must be handled), accordingly, many AG's would opine that to execute the agreement with such a clause is an ultra vires act (exceeding the signator's authority) and therefore void. rob ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ann Okerson" <ann.okerson@yale.edu> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 8:52 PM Subject: Re: License problem with American Geophysical Union > The "Other institutions have signed, why not you?" has a Twin. That Twin > is, "You're the first one ever to mention this as a problem!" The Twin is > *immensely* irritating no matter what the context (usually a customer > exchange of some sort, and stands for "you're being stupid and > unreasonable") and definitely so in contract conversations. Ann > Okerson/Yale Library
- Prev by Date: RE: License problem with American Geophysical Union
- Next by Date: IAA Will Continue to Push for Revised Analysis of Publishers Mergers
- Previous by thread: RE: License problem with American Geophysical Union
- Next by thread: Re: License problem with American Geophysical Union
- Index(es):