[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Dave's version (RE: License problem with American GeophysicalUnion)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, <rickand@unr.edu>
- Subject: Dave's version (RE: License problem with American GeophysicalUnion)
- From: "Dave Fisher" <Dave@library.ucsd.edu>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:32:31 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Rick - Thanks for your insights. You raise legitimate concerns and I applaud your tenacity. It can only work to everyone's favor ultimately. AGU had a tremendous learning curve as they entered the online market place, both licensing and price wise. We've only licensed G-cubed as a site license thus far. Now that they've liberalized their pricing structure - which only came about because no one would or could pay the extraordinary sums they were asking for a site license - UC is once again exploring site licensing their entire journal list. As Pete Brueggeman, the SIO Librarian paraphrased it in a recent conversation, AGU has the distinction of being the publisher who gave an ejournal and no one came. They had virtually no institutional subscribers last year. Dave Fisher
- Prev by Date: RE: Requesting User Information and Policy Agreement Prior to Data Exports
- Next by Date: Re: copyright protection paper
- Previous by thread: Usage-based pricing, a view
- Next by thread: Re: Consulting with counsel (RE: License problem with AmericanGeophysical Union)
- Index(es):