[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Requesting User Information and Policy Agreement Prior to Data Exports
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Requesting User Information and Policy Agreement Prior to Data Exports
- From: "David Goodman" <David.Goodman@liu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:47:17 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The users of a library are entitled to complete anonymity in their use of any source of information. In many cases this is a matter of state law--both with respect to private and public institutions. I personally have consistently refused to approve licenses that require otherwise. Some of my colleagues have on very rare occasions for unique sources of information been willing to acquire materials where the use requires the user to state his identification. Even in those cases, this requirement only incidentally occurs in the process of establishing a connection. I have never seen it written in the contracts--if it were, I find it difficult to imagine a university legal department that would permit them. I think those of my colleagues who have done so are categorically wrong. We as librarians are obliged to maintain our users' rights--if they individually choose to waive them personally we can not stop them, but we have no business in waiving them in advance on their behalf. As an analogous situation, almost all university libraries now refuse to handle government classified information, though they did in World War II and for much of the Cold War. Indeed, most universities do not permit classified research on campus. If such research is appropriate and necessary, it must be conducted elsewhere, because such secrecy is not compatible with academic freedom. Neither is the furnishing of user information to outside commercial enterprises. For what purpose do you require this information? If you wish to ensure that the users are in fact members of the contracting institution, this can be done in less obtrusive ways: the institution can maintain a secure authentication server. (I note that for some public institutions this is not possible, as in some jurisdictions all government-purchased information must be available to all citizens who may wish to use the library.) So what will you do with the names and email addresses? All institutions will provide for the necessary coooperation in investigating and halting breaches of their contracts, and all standard contracts provide for this. Those information services that attempt to gather personal identification typically request information that can have no rational purpose except for sales of the company's products; given that, I have little confidence in promises of privacy. I point out that it is no longer technically necessary for a user to provide an email address for the export of data. If it cannot be downloaded directly, it can be posted to a secure site, and retrieved with a secure and anonymous password. The technology is widely used for such purposes as document delivery. Individual click-on licenses are acceptable, if you think they offer you any particular protection (I cannot personally see what good they do, as terms like those you suggest are basic to all databases). Naturally, you must incorporate them in your own system; libraries have hundreds of databases and it is generally impractical for them to incorporate these provisions into their systems. All libraries make a practice of instructing patrons to respect intellectual property. In these times, we all need to act together to increase user privacy for information systems, not compromise it further. Dr. David Goodman dgoodman@liu.edu -----Original Message----- From: Patrick MacDougall [mailto:patrick_macdougall@yahoo.com] Sent: Wed 9/10/2003 6:37 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Requesting User Information and Policy Agreement Prior to Data Exports Question regarding the request of user information and policy agreement prior to data exports: I work for a company that markets primarily to academic institutions. We are developing a new online product and anticipate requiring users to "accept" or "agree" to a clear statement whenever downloading or exporting data from the database. The institution will have agreed to some Terms of Service when purchasing, of course, but we still want to communicate with individual users that there are limits on what we want them to do with = the data. The question is: Does requiring users to enter names or affiliations in order to download data present any kind of issues with privacy/freedom in the academic or library environment? We are thinking of including the following on at least the first version of the data download screen: - Asking users for name - Asking them for affiliation - Asking them for e-mail address (which they'll need to provide anyway in order to export) - Asking them to click "agree/accept" on some statement like "I agree that these data are to be used for educational or personal use only, and that these data cannot be resold or used for other commercial purposes, posted on a subscription or free site, or forwarded beyond this initial export." Thank you in advance for your assistance. Kind regards, Patrick MacDougall
- Prev by Date: Usage-based pricing, a view
- Next by Date: Dave's version (RE: License problem with American GeophysicalUnion)
- Previous by thread: Requesting User Information and Policy Agreement Prior to Data Exports
- Next by thread: RE: Requesting User Information and Policy Agreement Prior to Data Exports
- Index(es):