[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: License problem with American Geophysical Union
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: License problem with American Geophysical Union
- From: "DuBose, Stefanie" <DUBOSES@MAIL.ECU.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 18:45:19 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I've run into the same problem with that license and have not signed it. Which leads to a related question: with all the time spent negotiating database licenses, fun as it is, how much time do people expend licensing online journals, especially if the title is free with print? One problem I ran into last year with our online only subscriptions was the amount of time I had to invest in negotiating the darn things, and we continue to swap titles to online only. Our vendor manages the contact with the publisher for the electronic access, but it still is my responsibility to negotiate the license to our user's advantage/protection. Stefanie DuBose Head, Acquisitions Joyner Library East Carolina University Greenville, NC 27258-4353 (p)252-328-2598 (f)252-328-4834 duboses@mail.ecu.edu -----Original Message----- From: Rick Anderson [mailto:rickand@unr.edu] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 8:11 AM To: Liblicense-L@Lists. Yale. Edu Subject: License problem with American Geophysical Union Here's another question for the collective wisdom. I'm negotiating a license agreement with the American Geophysical Union, and I'm finding them surprisingly unwilling to bend on a term that, if left unchanged, would make our library institutionally responsible for the behavior of all authorized users. Actually, the AGU has bent somewhat -- first by rephrasing the clause but leaving it functionally identical, then by substantively changing it without leaving the library clearly free of institutional responsibility for patron misuse. The changes are getting us closer to an acceptable license, but I'm surprised by AGU's unique unwillingness simply to take that language out. My contact there tells me that some (though not all) of AGU's library customers have simply signed off on the original language. I find that hard to believe, unless these customers are signing their licenses without reading them, which is (unfortunately) a possibility. Has anyeone out there either made a conscious decision to accede to the terms as written, or succeeded in getting AGU to change them substantively? ------------- Rick Anderson Director of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries (775) 784-6500 x273 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: HARRASSOWITZ NEWS No. 72
- Next by Date: Re: Lawmakers to Weigh Database Protection Bill
- Previous by thread: License problem with American Geophysical Union
- Next by thread: Re: License problem with American Geophysical Union
- Index(es):